Buttercamp – New York

I just got back from New York City and I am happy to announce that Buttercamp was a success! Buttercamp took place at the  ITP labs of New York’s Tisch School of the Arts. It was a hack session sponsored by the WebMadeMovies project. The idea behind the hack session was simple – Make cool HTML5 demos using popcorn.js and butter.js (Butterapp – The Popcorn.js Authoring Tool)  and any other tool you find. In preparation for the day Brett Gaylor and Ben Moskowitz (who did an awesome job organizing btw) reached out to artists, filmmakers and designers. Ben also had some of his students attend. Anyone interested in participating simply had to fill out a form proposing their idea or project. The requirements were simple, you had to have an HTML5 video, a story to tell, and a developer who knew their way around the web. Each project group was assigned a popcorn.js and butter.js expert to help with the JavaScript part of the demo. The process was flawless. The filmmaker/artist explained their idea and their vision and started annotating their video. The team developer worked on the look and feel. The popcorn.js/butter.js expert started on the functionality. Watch the Video Blog.

The Groups

#18daysinegypt

You can read more about the project on their website. The inspiration for their buttercamp demo came from the current conflict in Egypt. The idea was to produce a non linear timeline. The main video was positioned to take over the entire screen.  The video was of a protest happening on a bridge. As the video played information about the location appeared on the screen like Wikipedia articles, close-up photos of the protesters, and even videos of protesters being interviewed. The main challenge for this demo was getting content that was related. Who was on this bridge tweeting posting photos to Flickr etc. as the protest was happening. The main video showed one angle of the protest but the extra data formed a bigger however an incomplete picture. The question remains: how does one go about getting the whole story from every angle. Demo links here!

through a lens darkly

You can read more about the project on their website. The teams wanted to showcase the work of Sylvia Isabe using butter.js. Since this project has a lot of material, it is fair to say that they wanted to get a deeper understanding of how the tools work so that they can use their knowledge and apply it to future work. The team’s tinkering led to an improvement made to the butter.js tool. An import/export tool! The feature is still in review but the idea is to be able to import work previous done using the tool in order to make changes and add content. Demo links coming soon!

everything is a remix

This project aims at revealing how a particular video came to be. Which resources were used in its making and how the content was “remixed”.  This was more of a proof of concept than an actual demo request. Kirby Ferguson and I worked on this. Kirby wanted to explore an interface that  jumped down rabbit holes for more stuff to watch/learn. Kind of like Jonathan’s Donald Duck demo however instead of having information around the video provide the ability for the user to see the original clip in a clear way.  Kirby came up with a simple wire-frame:

When the main video came to a point where an original source video was available a button would appear. In this case we had two source videos. When the user clicked the button a new video would open up on top of the original with extra content (in this case an amazon link). As a result of this we realized that we need a video plugin in popcorn.js which i took some time at the beginning of the day to develop. It is currently making its way into the review process.  The main challenge of this demo was CSS. The position of the second video on top of the video proved to be oddly challenging and at the end just did not work. Temporarily you can view the demo here. The idea that Kirby wanted to explore is possible however it really need a designer to make it work.

robots

The idea of the buttercamp demo was to provide a non-linear type of story telling. The user made their own experience by choosing a path to explore. Bobby, a new member of the webmademovies/Mozilla team did an awesome job fine tuning the demo. View it here (Firefox only for now).

Graffiti Markup Language (GML)

The GML project has been around for some time. You can read about it on their website. The video aimed at connecting graffiti with video. A GML popcorn.js plugin is already in the works. The demo can be viewed here (it is most likely getting tweaked as you read this) a similar but different demo can be viewed here.

Tubeyloops

Tubeyloops’ focus was actually remixing video. You can read the project proposal.  Greg Dorsainville had a vision of having multiple videos and allowing the user to remix them on the fly in order to produce a finished product. What ended up happening here was AWESOME and hopefully in time I can link you to a blog explaining more. Data from pattern sketch was used to alter the video’s audio and to produce sequences of the final product. How it worked: There were four video clips each linked to a button on the keyboard (QWER). When one of the buttons were pressed the corresponding video played until another button was pressed. A real unique remix was formed each time the demo was used.

Individuals

There were a lot of people there, including Ben’s students, that wanted to learn more about HTML5 video and popcorn.js. We had about an hour dedicated to them in order to provide an overview of what HTML5 was and what you can do with it and just an overall tutorial on using popcorn.js and butter.js. As a result of this group using butter.js a number of bugs have been filled in order to improve the Butterapp – The Popcorn.js Authoring Tool

Lessons Learned

The day went great, participation was through the roof, and the demos were mind-blowing. However, as with most things in this world, Buttercamp can use some improvements.

  • The day was way too long. We started at 9:30 am and finished at 10pm. I would say we started seeing people leaving around 4pm. A little less than half of the people stayed for the show and tell at the end.
  • More designers were needed. A lot of the demos were centered around the design. I already talked about CSS being the only thing blocking my demo from doing what it is supposed to do. On days like this design experts are needed to fine tune the demo once all of the content has been collected.
  • A server to host all of the demos. It would be nice to allow people to ftp their demos as they were working on them. It definitely would have made this blog better, but it would also eliminate the time it will now take to get all of the demos from each team.

Photos

Conclusion

Buttercamp was fantastic. If you missed it maybe you can start a petition to get Buttercamp going in your town. The day went smoothly and encountered no real problems. Everyone had a great time collaborating and sharing ideas. If you attended buttercamp please share your stories, pictures, and results.

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Code Review, SR+ … but why?

I wanted to take some time and talk about code review. Let me start of by explaining what “code review” is, or rather what it is in reference to this blog. Code review is the act of looking at someone’s code in order to evaluate it.  Code that is in review is often referred to as a patch. The purpose of the code is to fix a bug, add functionality, or improve performance. Once the patch passes review it is then staged/added to the core of the project. The reason behind the review is simple. Does the code do what it says it is supposed to do? It is important to note that every project has review requirements.  For example, the popcorn-js project I am working on has the following requirements:

  1. Ensure the code follows the style guide and is appropriate
  2. Ensure the code passes lint
  3. Ensure main tests pass on multiple browsers: test/index.html
  4. Ensure new tests were added to test the new functionality and that they pass
  5. Ensure that other tests such as parser or plugin tests that are affected by the new code also pass

Looking at these requirements a patch for the popcorn-js project has to: fix/add the functionality it is meant to fix/add, it has to include tests, and it also has to follow a style guide. If the specific patch that you are looking at is missing any of these the review simply fails. However, what happens when it passes? Lately I have been seeing short and sweet review comments: “Super Review (SR) + ” . But what does this mean exactly? Did you follow the review requirements? Do you even know they exist? When a code patch fails review the reviewer always states the reason for the failure. This is obvious since the problem has to be outlined before it can be fixed. Is it too much to expect the same type of courtesy for a passing review? After all, the way a patch was tested is significant. I am not saying that the person reviewing the patch is not to be trusted. I am however pointing out that there is merit behind doing reviews. However, if a review is not properly documented it will be unofficially re-reviewed by the person who is responsible for staging the patch. Why? Simply because the person staging/adding the new code wants to ensure that nothing broke in the process. I am aware that the person staging usually checks to ensure noting is broken but there is a major difference here. For example, looking back at  the popcorn-js project and it’s review process requirements you will notice that the project has core unit tests as well as other parser and plugin tests. Typically after something has been staged the core unit tests, including any main demos, would be run. The plugin and parser test however would not. From a release engineer’s perspective proper review documentation saves a lot of time. Let me provide an example of good review documentation based on popcorn-js’ requirements:

SR+, code looks good

No lint errors

Unit tests passing on (Vista) Firefox, Chrome and Safari

This patch affects the googleMap plugin. I verified that all unit tests/demos using this plugin work as expected on the browsers mentioned above.

Notice that I am not writing a whole paragraph. Point form notes is all you really need to let the appropriate people know what you did and why the review had passed.  I hope you keep this in mind when doing a review.

 

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Popcorn-js 0.3v Release

Popcorn-js is already on version 0.3. If you haven’t been keeping up-to-date feel free to read my 0.2v release blog. The major addition in this release is subtitle support. As it stands popcorn-js can take TTXT, SRT, WebSRT, TTML, SSA, and  SBV files, parse them, and spit out subtitles positioned right on top of the video!!! If you want more information read Steven’s blog post.  Of course we have made numerous other fixes and additions. For a complete list view the changelog.

Looking to get involved?

There is countless ways for people to get involved in the project including idea generation, video generation, bug filing, documentation, promotion, and of course writing code. If you want to get involved here is a list of links to get you started:

If you want to use popcornjs and you are having problems feel free to contact us. You can comment on this blog, file a ticket on Lighthouse, send me an email, or come on IRC. WE WILL HELP YOU 🙂

Popcorn-js in Use

If you have yet to realized popcornjs’ potential, take a second to look at these two sites that use popcorn-js. The first one is the Annotation of the 2011 State of the Union brought to you by PBS and the popcornjs team. The second one shows of Jonathan McIntosh’s Donald Duck remix originally showcased at the Open Video Conference in NY city. Before the making of said page people can only look at the video. Whereas now, you can see all of the different components that had to be mixed together in order to make the video.

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Popcorn-js 0.2v Release

If you haven’t heard about popcorn-js you are seriously missing out. Some Torontonians refer to it as CP24 online but of course its much better –  it’s open-source and allows anyone to make a content driven site. [Read my last post to get a better overview]  It has been less than 6 months since the initial launch of popcorn-js and only 1 month since our decision to make it into a plug-in architecture. Yes, we revamped the entire library in just one month.

Whats Changed?

In short everything; we re-wrote the entire thing. Using a plugin architecture enables people to easily add functionality to the library. Before, in order to get new features people would have to hack the actual popcorn.js file. Now they can make their own files (plugins, parsers) and simply use them. Another advantage of this is the fact that people will no longer need to write XML, although it is still supported.  Check-out the complete changelog. Read bocoup’s blog about the design.

Another exciting addition is butter. People who don’t want to code will need “butter for their popcorn”. Butter 0.1v has just been released. It is an online tool that enables anyone to make a popcorn.js enriched webpage. You just give it a link to your video, choose your plugins, fill in the needed data and it generates a webpage for you!

Looking to get involved?

There is countless ways for people to get involved in the project including idea generation, video generation, bug filing, documentation, promotion, and of course writing code. If you want to get involved here is a list of links to get you started:

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Seneca at polytechnicscanada.ca

Polytechnics Canada is a national alliance made up of nine institutions dedicated to helping colleges and industry create high-quality jobs for the future. The members include Seneca College, Humber College, Sheridan College, OLDS College, George Brown College, Conestoga College British Columbia Institute of Technology, Algonquin College, and SAIT Polytechnic. The idea here is to work closely with companies to promote innovation and practical applied research.  Being a graduate, and now working for Seneca College, I have the opportunity of working with industry partners. Seneca’s Centre for Development of Open Technology is currently working with Mozilla, NexJ, Aerius 3D and Fedora. Out of all the research projects at Seneca, popcornjs was chosen to be presented at the 2010 Polytechnics Canada meetup. Each member was to choose one project that would be presented by a student during a 5 min Power Point presentation. Yes Power Point. 5 min 5 slides. Not sure how that promotes innovation but I guess it allows for a controlled environment with flawless transition from one presentation to the next. Being part of the popcornjs team I volunteered to present. For those of you who do not know what popcornjs is you have to read my blogs more often. I joke. Popcorn.js is a JavaScript library aimed at allowing non-technical people to manipulate open video on the web. It provides a way for filmmakers to control the environment in which their video is viewed by integrating semantic content (wiki articles, google maps, google news, webpages, twitter, flickr) with HTML5 video. I created a demo specifically aimed at explaining what popcorn can do for this presentation. View it here.  Some of the other student presentations consisted of new concept wind mills, water oil filtration units, and high tech. lenses.

After the 5min presentation came the “elevator pitch” to the Minister of Stats for Science and Technology Gary Goodyear. We were suppose to pitch our projects. I was prepared, at least I thought I was.  I had it all figured out. I was going to start with “Imagine CP24 on the web” a simple statement that I thought would get his attention. After all I heard a lot of people refer to CP24 while explaining popcorn it really is a close comparison. However, during dinner, i was sitting beside a member of NSERC and as soon as he realized that I was to do a pitch he said “pitch me”. So I went for it and got blown out of the water. Whats CP24? he asked. He continued to state that he and the Minister would be interested in knowing how popcornjs impacts Canada’s economic growth.  Well? How doest it? I mumbled something about revolutionizing the web and bringing Canadian developers to the top of Internet technology. But really popcornjs in an Open Source project that will not make or save a particular company millions of dollars. However, it has the potential of blowing up. I mean popcornjs was already featured in Wired’s webmonkey, and CHIP an online magazine. But how does one put a price tag on something that is free to use? Anyone?  Please comment if you have any ideas as I am sure this question will appear again.

 

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Popcorn-js Gets a Face-lift

Since May 2010 I have been involved in a Mozilla sponsored project popcornjs. The project aims at bringing filmmakers and artist to the web by providing an easy way to add extra data to their videos. So instead of posting their video on youtube or vimeo – websites that decide what the viewer sees around the video. They can host their own video and use popcorn to display timed data such as wikipedia articles, google news, google maps, flickr, twitter, and websites. Of course the time at which this data comes in and out can be controlled.

Because the initial aim of this project was to make it easy for non tech savvy people to use, we used an XML structure to control what data would be used at what time during the video.  As the project received more exposure, we were getting more and more feedback. This feedback included requests for more feature supports such as Open Maps, and a more flexible Twitter function. As well as a better way of allowing users to add their own functionality. As it was, users had to dig in to popcorn’s core in order to add anything new. Our choice of using XML has also been questioned.

To combat all of this and also to bring popcornjs to the next level Mozilla decided to bring in the big guns. Bocoup is a Boston based company that has a lot of experience with jQuery and its plug-in architecture. They have taken popcorn under their wings and recommended a plug-in architecture that both developers and filmmakers will be happy to use. This is not to say that they have taken over the project. Their main goal is to build butter. A popcorn UI that anyone can use to produce a popcorn enhanced website. User will fill out what feature they want and the in and outs and then press export to generate a webpage with a default template. Most of the code updates will still be done by Scott and I. However, Rick, Boaz, and Al will guide us along the way.

So the bottom line. Popcorn now fully supports plug-ins. We are still working to convert all of the functionality into plug-ins but when we are done anyone will be able to write plug-ins. This will include parsing different types of data (JSON, QuickTime export format)  and DOCUMENTATION.

Read more about this: Scott’s blog, bocoup’s blog.

View all of my blogs on popcorn-js
View all of my blogs

Seneca at technicity.ca

On Nov 30, 2010 Seneca was invited to showcase their IT work at technicity.ca. The Technicity event’s goals were to acknowledge the talent we have in Toronto and bring forth a plan of action to foster this talent. David Crow talked about how people tend to go to California or Boston to look for talent even though Toronto has some of the best schools.  Seneca was fortunate enough to get invited to the event. I along with Scott Downe and Andor Salga got a change to showcase our work including processing-js, popcorn-js, pointstream, and c3dl. I must say that the crowd was amazing. We got a lot of positive feedback including “this is a jewl… don’t give it away, sell it” — about popcorn. Usually we are faced with people that do not have a good understanding of technology and it’s capabilities. However at technicity we were faced with people that did not understand why or maybe how people can make money doing open-source development.

 

View all of my blogs