As I stated before in my post, I will be performing some peer-reviews for my 0.6 release. Today I looked at applyMatrix() coded by aSydik. Here is a link to the lighthouse ticket, the processing reference and the JAVA code I used to decide what the function is suppose to return. This is my second review of applyMatrix(), the first time I reviewed it I had to fail it and set it to review-needs-work. This was because the example that can be found on the processing reference page did not work as it was suppose to. Now, aSydik (Mickael Medel) has fixed the problem and put up a link to his test. Check it out.
he basis for my decision:
- the function returns the appropriate value.
- the function is written following the coding standards . Using 2 spaces instead of a tab, and leaving a space around brackets
- there is tests available to test the function
After reviewing the code I gave applyMatrix() the status of super-review-requested.